All posts
Training science ·3 February 2025 · 10 min read

Your pedal stroke: what's worth working on, and what to ignore

The Moveee team

Free coaching · a real route for every ride

Type "how to improve your pedal stroke" into a search box and the answers arrive with total confidence: pedal in circles, pull up on the backstroke, scrape mud off your shoe. It's some of the most repeated advice in cycling — and most of it doesn't survive contact with the evidence.

Here's what's actually happening around the pedal circle, what's worth working on, and what to stop worrying about.

The "pedal in circles" myth

Studies looking at trained cyclists consistently find that they do not pull up meaningfully on the backstroke — and that deliberately trying to do so tends to make riders less efficient, not more. Elite riders don't produce a smooth, even circle of force; they produce a big push and get the other leg out of the way. Chasing a perfectly round power profile is optimising the wrong thing.

What each part of the circle actually does

Think of the stroke as a clock face, with 12 at the top:

12 → 3 o'clock

The power phase

Most of your power

Hip and knee extension driving the pedal down and forward. This is where the overwhelming majority of your force is produced, and it's the part worth training.

3 → 6 o'clock

The finish

Meaningful

Continuing to push through the bottom, with the calf helping transmit force. Ends with a subtle 'scraping' feeling as the foot passes the bottom.

6 → 9 o'clock

The upstroke

Very little

The leg is being lifted, largely by the opposite leg's downstroke. Trying to pull hard here is where most riders waste effort — see below.

9 → 12 o'clock

The recovery

Near zero

Getting the leg back over the top and out of the way, ready to push again. Unweighting matters; actively pulling doesn't.

The practical takeaway is blunt: the downstroke is the stroke. If you want more power, you get it by producing more force from roughly 12 to 5 o'clock — not by inventing power on the way back up.

The one thing worth fixing on the upstroke

There is a genuine exception, and it's a subtle one. While you shouldn't actively pull, you also shouldn't leave your recovering leg sitting like a dead weight on the pedal — because your other leg then has to lift it as well as drive the bike forward.

The goal is unweighting: taking your own leg's mass off the pedal on the way up, so it isn't resisting. That's a very different sensation from hauling upward, and it's largely automatic in experienced riders. If you're going to think about the backstroke at all, think "get out of the way," not "pull."

A barbell being lifted, seen close up
More force through the downstroke is mostly a strength question — which is why the gym shows up in a pedalling article.

Four sessions that genuinely help

1

Single-leg drills

30–60 s per leg, 3–4 rounds, on a trainer at moderate resistance

With one foot unclipped you feel every dead spot immediately. Excellent for smoothing the transition over the top — but keep them short, they're fatiguing and hard on the knees.

2

Low-cadence torque work

4 × 5 min at 50–60 rpm, sweet-spot power, seated

Trains the ability to produce high force per stroke. Build up gradually and stop if you feel any knee discomfort.

3

High-cadence spin-ups

6 × 30 s building to your maximum sustainable cadence

Improves coordination and smoothness at speed. Aim to stay still in the saddle — bouncing means you've exceeded your control.

4

Cadence variation within a block

Alternate 2 min at 95 rpm / 2 min at 70 rpm at the same power

Teaches you to produce the same watts in different ways, which is exactly what a varied road demands.

Cadence: there is no magic number

Riders spend a lot of energy worrying about whether they should be spinning at 90 rpm or grinding at 70. The research on self-selected cadence is fairly reassuring: most people naturally settle near their own efficient range, and forcing a big change usually makes things worse rather than better.

What's genuinely worth having is range — the ability to produce your power comfortably at 70 rpm on a steep ramp and at 100 rpm chasing a wheel on the flat. That's what the cadence-variation work above builds, and it's far more useful than converging on some ideal number.

Before you optimise the stroke, check the fit

A lot of what gets diagnosed as bad pedalling technique is actually a bike-fit problem. Saddle too high produces hip rocking and a stretched, dead bottom of the stroke. Saddle too low overloads the quads and closes the hip. Cleat position affects where force transmits through the foot.

If your stroke feels genuinely awkward, or you get persistent knee or hip discomfort, spend the money on a proper bike fit before you spend months on drills. It's the higher-leverage fix by a wide margin.

Two cyclists riding together on a road through green fields
Smoothness comes from years of riding, not from thinking hard about the six o'clock position.

Where to do the drills

Single-leg work and low-cadence torque intervals are close to impossible to do properly outdoors — you need constant resistance, no junctions and no descents, and with one foot unclipped you really don't want traffic. The trainer is the natural home for all of it.

Moveee Indoor is a reasonable place to run them: pair a trainer in the browser, load a structured session, and the resistance is held steady for you while you ride one of your own real routes in 3D. For the torque work specifically you'll want gradient-driven slope mode rather than ERG — our ERG mode guide explains when to use which. It's free while in alpha and there's nothing to install.

Push harder from twelve to five, get the other leg out of the way, own a wide cadence range, and get your fit checked. Everything else is folklore.

Sources 6

Where this article summarises a study, the study itself is linked — not a write-up of it.

  1. 1 Korff T, Romer LM, Mayhew I, Martin JC Effect of pedaling technique on mechanical effectiveness and efficiency in cyclists · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2007
  2. 2 Theurel J, Crepin M, Foissac M, Temprado JJ Effects of different pedalling techniques on muscle fatigue and mechanical efficiency during prolonged cycling · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · 2012
  3. 3 Coyle EF, Feltner ME, Kautz SA, et al. Physiological and biomechanical factors associated with elite endurance cycling performance · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 1991
  4. 4 Mornieux G, Stapelfeldt B, Gollhofer A, Belli A Effects of pedal type and pull-up action during cycling · International Journal of Sports Medicine · 2008
  5. 5 Marsh AP, Martin PE The association between cycling experience and preferred and most economical cadences · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 1993
  6. 6 Bini R, Hume PA, Croft JL Effects of bicycle saddle height on knee injury risk and cycling performance · Sports Medicine · 2011
Stop guessing at it

See this in your own numbers

Moveee builds your power curve, fitness and fatigue from every ride you upload, and writes a training plan around them. It is free, it takes one Strava connection, and it will tell you more about your riding in a week than any article can.

Start free

Keep reading

Training science

Standing power: why some riders climb out of the saddle and others can't

Standing adds body weight and upper-body bracing to the pedal stroke, at a cost in oxygen that only pays off near maximal effort or on steep roads. Who it suits, and how to train it.

Training science

Cooling down and stretching: what actually helps, honestly

The evidence is far less conclusive than the folklore. Here's what a cool-down genuinely does, what stretching is and isn't good for, and the six stretches worth ten minutes after a ride.

Training science

Training young riders: the principles worth holding

The area of cycling where confident advice does the most damage. Three broad stages, four things to get right, and why the only goal that matters is whether they still want to ride at 25.

Training science

The grey zone: is riding at 'medium' really wasted training?

"Junk miles" is the most repeated idea in amateur cycling and one of the least examined. Where the polarised argument came from, what those studies actually compared, and the case for tempo that the slogan quietly throws away.

Training science

The cycling year: how to plan twelve months from off-season to peak

Transition, base, build, peak, race: what each block is for, how long it runs for an amateur with one summer goal, and where the neat diagram and the messy year part ways.

Training science

Cycling cadence: does it actually matter? What the science says

The internet is full of one true cadence — the research says your legs already found theirs. What the science honestly shows about self-selected cadence, when deliberate high or low RPM work genuinely helps, the typical ranges by situation, and the drills worth folding into an easy hour.

Training science

Base miles aren't dead: how to build an aerobic engine over winter

Long, steady, unglamorous riding is still the foundation everything else is built on. Here's why base matters, how much you really need, and how to make winter miles count.

Training science

Ice baths after riding: recovery, or throwing away your adaptation?

Cold water genuinely restores short-term function, and there is reasonable evidence it dulls the long-term adaptation you trained for. The resolution is not "never" — it is knowing which of those two you need this week.

Training science

Morning or evening: does the time you train change what you get?

Peak power really is higher in the late afternoon, and the effect is much smaller than the effect of actually doing the session. What circadian rhythm does to performance, and why the honest answer is "whenever you will keep turning up".

Training science

Breathing on the bike: the skill nobody teaches you

It won't add watts to your FTP, but it will change how hard an effort feels and whether you stay composed. Five drills, four habits to unlearn, and why position is half the problem.

Training science

Menstrual cycle and cycling training: what the research actually shows

Phase-based training plans are sold with far more confidence than the evidence supports. An honest read of a genuinely weak literature — and the things that are well established, from iron status to energy availability.

Guides

Commuting by bike: how to make it count as training

Riding to work has some of the strongest health evidence in all of cycling. How to turn thirty minutes each way into genuine training, when to keep it easy instead, and the logistics that make it sustainable.

Ready to ride with a plan?

Connect Strava and get your first three-week block today — free.

Continue with Strava