Reverse periodisation: intensity in winter, miles in summer
The Moveee team
Free coaching · a real route for every ride
The traditional cycling year is so entrenched that most riders have never questioned it: long slow miles through the winter, intensity added in spring, sharpness in the weeks before the event. It came from professional riders in mild climates with unlimited time, and for them it makes complete sense.
For an amateur in a northern winter with a job, it can be exactly backwards — and reverse periodisation is the alternative that says so.
The idea
Flip the order. Do the intensity when your time is short and the weather is bad, because intense sessions are short and work perfectly well indoors. Build the volume when the days are long and the roads are dry, because long rides need daylight and decent weather.
The load still rises through the year. What changes is which quality gets built first.
| When | Traditional | Reverse |
|---|---|---|
| November – January | Long easy base miles | Short, sharp intensity indoors |
| February – March | Add tempo and threshold | Add threshold, start extending rides |
| April – May | Add VO2max and race sharpness | Volume rises toward event length |
| The event | Peaked from a broad base | Peaked from a sharp top end and late volume |
Why it works better than it sounds
The objection is obvious: surely you need a base before you can handle intensity? In the strict sense — a rider who has never ridden a bike should not start with VO2max intervals — that is true. For a returning rider with years of history behind them, it is much weaker than it sounds. Their base does not vanish over one winter; detraining: how fast you lose fitness covers just how durable it is.
The second point is that intensity builds aerobic fitness too. High-intensity work is not purely anaerobic — it drives central adaptations as well, which is why riders who only do short hard sessions still get aerobically fitter. It is less efficient at it per hour of misery than steady riding, but three hard hours a week beats zero good hours pretending to be five.
Who it suits
If January means two hours on the trainer rather than five on the road, spending that time on intensity is a better use of it than pretending it is base.
Anyone whose winter rides are an hour after work is already doing reverse periodisation. Naming it lets you plan the rest of the year around it.
An August target gives you the spring and summer to build volume. A March target does not — which is the case where traditional order still wins.
The best plan is the one you complete. A rider who abandons three-hour December rides but happily does an hour of intervals is better served by the reverse order.
A winter week, reversed
- Two hard indoor sessions. One VO2max — 30/30s are ideal for this — and one threshold or over-under session. Both fit in an hour including warm-up.
- One longer ride at the weekend. Whatever the weather and daylight allow. Two hours is fine. This keeps the aerobic machinery awake without demanding a heroic winter.
- One or two genuinely easy spins. Short, indoors, no targets.
- Strength work. Winter is when it fits, and it does not compete with a plan built on short sessions — strength training for cyclists covers the case.
Then, from late February, the long rides get longer while the intensity holds at maintenance. By May you are doing what the traditional plan was doing in January, except outdoors, in daylight, with fitness you built in the dark.
The honest limitations
- It is not a licence to skip volume forever. If your event is five hours long, you will need long rides at some point. Reverse periodisation moves them, it does not delete them — see durability for what those hours are actually buying.
- Intensity year-round is a real risk. The plan works because the hard weeks are followed by recovery weeks. A rider who does two hard sessions every week from November to August without a down week will not make it to August.
- Early-season events fit poorly. If your goal is a March sportive, the traditional order is the right one — you cannot build the volume after the event.
It only works if the indoor hours are good ones
The whole approach rests on the winter sessions actually happening. That means the trainer setup has to be something you will use on a Tuesday when it is dark and you would rather not — a fan, a screen at eye level, and a session that starts without ten minutes of software wrangling. Pain cave setup covers the physical side.
Moveee Indoor runs in a browser tab — nothing to install, pair the trainer and go — and rides your own saved routes in 3D while ERG holds the interval targets. For a plan that lives or dies on whether you do the Tuesday session, removing the friction between deciding to ride and riding is worth more than it sounds. It is free while in alpha.
Sources 7
Where this article summarises a study, the study itself is linked — not a write-up of it.
- 1 Laursen PB, Jenkins DG The scientific basis for high-intensity interval training: optimising training programmes and maximising performance in highly trained endurance athletes · Sports Medicine · 2002
- 2 Helgerud J, Høydal K, Wang E, et al. Aerobic high-intensity intervals improve VO2max more than moderate training · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2007
- 3 Gibala MJ, Little JP, MacDonald MJ, Hawley JA Physiological adaptations to low-volume, high-intensity interval training in health and disease · Journal of Physiology · 2012
- 4 Mujika I, Padilla S Detraining: loss of training-induced physiological and performance adaptations. Part I · Sports Medicine · 2000
- 5 Issurin VB New horizons for the methodology and physiology of training periodization · Sports Medicine · 2010
- 6 Rønnestad BR, Hansen J, Ellefsen S Block periodization of high-intensity aerobic intervals provides superior training effects in trained cyclists · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · 2014
- 7 Rønnestad BR, Mujika I Optimizing strength training for running and cycling endurance performance: a review · Scandinavian Journal of Medicine & Science in Sports · 2014
See this in your own numbers
Moveee builds your power curve, fitness and fatigue from every ride you upload, and writes a training plan around them. It is free, it takes one Strava connection, and it will tell you more about your riding in a week than any article can.
Start freeKeep reading
The cycling year: how to plan twelve months from off-season to peak
Transition, base, build, peak, race: what each block is for, how long it runs for an amateur with one summer goal, and where the neat diagram and the messy year part ways.
Do long slow rides still work? The evidence for volume
Intervals get the attention, but the adaptations that make a cyclist durable come mostly from time. What the research says about volume, why low intensity isn't wasted time, and how short a long ride can usefully be.
The grey zone: is riding at 'medium' really wasted training?
"Junk miles" is the most repeated idea in amateur cycling and one of the least examined. Where the polarised argument came from, what those studies actually compared, and the case for tempo that the slogan quietly throws away.
Block periodisation: one signal at a time
Five hard sessions in a week, then two weeks of quiet. A sharper tool with a narrower handle than the standard mixed week — genuinely better for some riders, genuinely worse for others. Which one you are, and the week-two mistake that wastes the whole block.
Base miles aren't dead: how to build an aerobic engine over winter
Long, steady, unglamorous riding is still the foundation everything else is built on. Here's why base matters, how much you really need, and how to make winter miles count.
Junk miles: what they are and when they aren't
Easy riding is not junk; the fittest riders do most of their hours there. Unplanned medium riding usually is. A three-question test for any ride, and the evidence behind it.
The cyclist's bone problem: why riding alone doesn't build a skeleton
Road cycling is one of the few endurance sports associated with low bone mineral density, and the mechanism is not mysterious. Why unloaded exercise plus sweat losses plus under-eating compounds, and the short list of things that reverse it.
Big-gear, low-cadence work: strength on the bike, or just slow?
Fifty rpm up a climb in a gear you can barely turn feels like it must be building something. What torque intervals actually train, what the evidence says about transfer to real power, and the knee-load caution nobody puts in the session description.
Training with an injury: what you can keep doing and what to stop
Most cycling injuries leave some training on the table. Keep the intensity in whatever you can still do, load tendons rather than rest them, and rest fully for the few that demand it.
Four hours a week: the most fitness you can get from very little time
At four hours a week the 80/20 rule stops applying and two well-chosen interval sessions do most of the work. What the low-volume studies found, and a week that fits.
What your power curve says about you: sprinter, puncheur or diesel?
Your best 5 seconds, 1 minute, 5 minutes and 20 minutes tell a story your FTP alone can't: what kind of rider you actually are. How to read your own power-duration curve, the signature shapes of sprinters, puncheurs, diesels and climbers — and when to train your weakness versus doubling down on your strength.
Gels, drink mix or real food?
There is a mild moral dimension to this argument that does not deserve to be there. The real distinction is mechanical — how fast you need the carbohydrate and how hard you are riding when it arrives. Why most experienced riders end up using all three.